Should communities in Judea and Samaria be included in the map of tax benefits for communities?
Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too
Communities in Judea and Samaria face a security threat like border communities, and are therefore entitled to tax benefits that strengthen settlement there
Borders and periphery first
Tax benefits should be given by transparent criteria and go first to the north, the Gaza border area and the periphery
Votes on extending benefits in the north, the Gaza border area and the periphery are not counted here, because almost every party supported them. The question measures only the inclusion of communities in Judea and Samaria.
"Said" is the platform, and statements and posts by the list's candidates. "Did" is plenum votes, bills and recorded acts in the 25th Knesset. The placement rests on all the evidence together. The votes are the outgoing Knesset's, not the 26th's.
רק
BeYachad
Firm position: Borders and periphery first· Partial evidence
Said
We found no platform text, statement or post by the list on this subject.
Did
3 plenum votes · 3 toward "Borders and periphery first"
6 bills on the issue · Context only, did not move the placement
18 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 18 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
The parliamentary record here is that of the Yesh Atid faction in the 25th Knesset. Naftali Bennett's party did not sit in the 25th Knesset, so part of the current list is not represented in the voting data.
All sources (4)▾
רק
BeYachad
Firm position: Borders and periphery first
Partial evidence
What it rests on
Toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"Toward "Borders and periphery first"
Note: The parliamentary record here is that of the Yesh Atid faction in the 25th Knesset. Naftali Bennett's party did not sit in the 25th Knesset, so part of the current list is not represented in the voting data.
3 plenum votes · Official recordVotes marked "routine rejection" are private member's bills from the rival bloc in the preliminary reading, which are almost always rejected regardless of content, so they carry little weight.
Toward: Borders and periphery firstJune 4, 2026
18 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 18 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
19 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 19 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (first reading)
Toward: Borders and periphery firstRoutine rejection, low weightNovember 12, 2025
18 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 18 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading)
Firm position: Borders and periphery first· Partial evidence
Said
We found no platform text, statement or post by the list on this subject.
Did
3 plenum votes · 3 toward "Borders and periphery first"
4 bills on the issue · Context only, did not move the placement
4 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 4 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
The parliamentary record here is that of the Labor faction in the 25th Knesset. Meretz did not sit in the 25th Knesset, so part of the current list is not represented in the voting data.
All sources (4)▾
אמת
The Democrats
Firm position: Borders and periphery first
Partial evidence
What it rests on
Toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"Toward "Borders and periphery first"
Note: The parliamentary record here is that of the Labor faction in the 25th Knesset. Meretz did not sit in the 25th Knesset, so part of the current list is not represented in the voting data.
3 plenum votes · Official recordVotes marked "routine rejection" are private member's bills from the rival bloc in the preliminary reading, which are almost always rejected regardless of content, so they carry little weight.
Toward: Borders and periphery firstJune 4, 2026
4 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 4 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
4 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 4 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (first reading)
Toward: Borders and periphery firstRoutine rejection, low weightNovember 12, 2025
2 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 2 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading)
3 plenum votes · 3 toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"
6 bills on the issue · Context only, did not move the placement
14 of the list's MKs voted: 14 for, 0 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
Firm position: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too
Partial evidence
What it rests on
Toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"Toward "Borders and periphery first"
3 plenum votes · Official record
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooJune 4, 2026
14 of the list's MKs voted: 14 for, 0 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooMarch 24, 2026
20 of the list's MKs voted: 20 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (first reading)
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooNovember 12, 2025
26 of the list's MKs voted: 26 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading)
We found no platform text, statement or post by the list on this subject.
Did
The list did not sit in the 25th Knesset, so it has no votes to check.
ט
Religious Zionism–Zehut
Firm position: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too· Partial evidence
Said
1 platform section · 1 toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"
השר סמוטריץ' גם אישר הטבות מס ליהודה ושומרון שנועדו לעודד התיישבות ולהגיע ליעד של מיליון תושבים ביו"ש
Translation: “Minister Smotrich also approved tax benefits for Judea and Samaria intended to encourage settlement and to reach the goal of a million residents in Judea and Samaria”
3 plenum votes · 3 toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"
4 bills on the issue · Context only, did not move the placement
7 of the list's MKs voted: 7 for, 0 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
The current list is a technical bloc of Religious Zionism with Zehut, led by Moshe Feiglin, which did not sit in the 25th Knesset. The voting data reflects Religious Zionism only.
All sources (5)▾
ט
Religious Zionism–Zehut
Firm position: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too
Partial evidence
What it rests on
Toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"Toward "Borders and periphery first"
Note: The current list is a technical bloc of Religious Zionism with Zehut, led by Moshe Feiglin, which did not sit in the 25th Knesset. The voting data reflects Religious Zionism only.
3 plenum votes · Official record
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooJune 4, 2026
7 of the list's MKs voted: 7 for, 0 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooMarch 24, 2026
4 of the list's MKs voted: 4 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (first reading)
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooNovember 12, 2025
6 of the list's MKs voted: 6 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading)
Leaning toward Borders and periphery first· Weak evidence
Said
We found no platform text, statement or post by the list on this subject.
Did
2 plenum votes · 2 toward "Borders and periphery first"
4 bills on the issue · Context only, did not move the placement
5 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 5 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (first reading)
The parliamentary record here is that of the Hadash–Ta'al faction in the 25th Knesset only. Balad did not sit in the 25th Knesset, so part of the current list is not represented in the voting data.
All sources (3)▾
ודם
Joint List
Leaning toward Borders and periphery first
Weak evidence
What it rests on
Toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"Toward "Borders and periphery first"
Note: The parliamentary record here is that of the Hadash–Ta'al faction in the 25th Knesset only. Balad did not sit in the 25th Knesset, so part of the current list is not represented in the voting data.
2 plenum votes · Official recordVotes marked "routine rejection" are private member's bills from the rival bloc in the preliminary reading, which are almost always rejected regardless of content, so they carry little weight.
Toward: Borders and periphery firstMarch 24, 2026
5 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 5 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (first reading)
Toward: Borders and periphery firstRoutine rejection, low weightNovember 12, 2025
4 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 4 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading)
Leaning toward Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too· Weak evidence
Said
We found no platform text, statement or post by the list on this subject.
Did
1 plenum vote · 1 toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"
1 bill on the issue · Context only, did not move the placement
5 of the list's MKs voted: 5 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading)
Leaning toward Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too
Weak evidence
What it rests on
Toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"Toward "Borders and periphery first"
1 plenum vote · Official record
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooNovember 12, 2025
5 of the list's MKs voted: 5 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading)
We found no platform text, statement or post by the list on this subject.
Did
The list did not sit in the 25th Knesset, so it has no votes to check.
ל
Yisrael Beytenu
Firm position: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too· Partial evidence
Said
We found no platform text, statement or post by the list on this subject.
Did
1 plenum vote · 1 toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"
4 of the list's MKs voted: 4 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading) The list voted against its bloc's line in this vote.
Firm position: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too
Partial evidence
What it rests on
Toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"Toward "Borders and periphery first"
1 plenum vote · Official record
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooNovember 12, 2025
4 of the list's MKs voted: 4 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading) The list voted against its bloc's line in this vote.
Firm position: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too· Partial evidence
Said
We found no platform text, statement or post by the list on this subject.
Did
3 plenum votes · 3 toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"
1 bill on the issue · Context only, did not move the placement
6 of the list's MKs voted: 6 for, 0 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
Firm position: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too
Partial evidence
What it rests on
Toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"Toward "Borders and periphery first"
3 plenum votes · Official record
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooJune 4, 2026
6 of the list's MKs voted: 6 for, 0 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooMarch 24, 2026
4 of the list's MKs voted: 4 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (first reading)
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooNovember 12, 2025
4 of the list's MKs voted: 4 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading)
We found no platform text, statement or post by the list on this subject.
Did
The list did not sit in the 25th Knesset, so it has no votes to check.
עם
Ra'am
Leaning toward Borders and periphery first· Weak evidence
Said
We found no platform text, statement or post by the list on this subject.
Did
2 plenum votes · 2 toward "Borders and periphery first"
11 bills on the issue · Context only, did not move the placement
5 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 5 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (first reading)
Toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"Toward "Borders and periphery first"
2 plenum votes · Official recordVotes marked "routine rejection" are private member's bills from the rival bloc in the preliminary reading, which are almost always rejected regardless of content, so they carry little weight.
Toward: Borders and periphery firstMarch 24, 2026
5 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 5 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (first reading)
Toward: Borders and periphery firstRoutine rejection, low weightNovember 12, 2025
4 of the list's MKs voted: 0 for, 4 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading)
Firm position: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too· Partial evidence
Said
We found no platform text, statement or post by the list on this subject.
Did
3 plenum votes · 3 toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"
5 bills on the issue · Context only, did not move the placement
4 of the list's MKs voted: 4 for, 0 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
Firm position: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too
Partial evidence
What it rests on
Toward "Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria too"Toward "Borders and periphery first"
3 plenum votes · Official record
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooJune 4, 2026
4 of the list's MKs voted: 4 for, 0 against. For = the Tax Benefits for Settlement of the Eastern Confrontation Line Area (Judea and Samaria) Law, second and third readings
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooMarch 24, 2026
5 of the list's MKs voted: 5 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (first reading)
Toward: Tax benefits in Judea and Samaria tooNovember 12, 2025
7 of the list's MKs voted: 7 for, 0 against. For = to grant tax benefits to threatened communities in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) (preliminary reading)
